Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.editorRø, Johannes Gullestad
dc.contributor.editorBjur, Ingeborg
dc.contributor.editorEggen, Karen-Anna
dc.contributor.editorAllers, Robin
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T09:23:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T09:23:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1894-4795
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2658796
dc.description.abstractThe pandemic and the colossal societal ramifications it has caused so far, illustrate that a broadening of our definition of security beyond military threats, is overdue. Resilience should be included as an important element of national security. Immediate defence budget reductions are insignificant, but the long-term prospect suggests a downward trend. There is a danger that governments undertaking strategic reviews focus too narrowly on pandemics and under-appreciate the more traditional risks. The crisis is likely to amplify great power rivalry and pressure on the multilateral system. The erosion of transatlantic relations is part of this problem. In the face of new stressors, NATO needs financial and political investment. NATO should accelerate its work on communication and critical infrastructure standards. The United States and EU should improve coordination and align standards and acquisition rules. NATO-EU cooperation on assessing and remedying vulnerabilities is essential in preparing for the next strategic surprise.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIFS Insights;6/2020
dc.titleThe global pandemic, transatlantic security and national defence. Views from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Norwayen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.source.pagenumber24en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel