Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKvalsvik, Olav Martin
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-21T13:42:12Z
dc.date.available2011-02-21T13:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/99964
dc.description.abstractThe UN Members confer on the Security Council ‘primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security’. According to the UN Charter Chapter VII, Article 39, the Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace or acts of aggression, and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken, to maintain or restore international peace and security. These measures may include the use of armed force. This paper examines key considerations the Security Council must take when authorizing the use of armed force to prevent massive violations of international human rights. I will do this under the four headings; 1) the Councils´ legal mandate; 2) the political context; 3) the ‘humanitarian impulse’ in international relations and; 4) the issue of Security Council reform. The purpose is not to draw unambiguous conclusions but to contribute to the debate on the role of the Council as a collective instrument when humanitarian crises arise within a sovereign stateen_US
dc.language.isonoben_US
dc.publisherForsvarets høgskoleen_US
dc.subjectSikkerhetsrådeten_US
dc.subjectFolkeretten_US
dc.subjectMenneskerettigheteren_US
dc.titleSikkerhetsrådets forutsetninger for å gripe inn i humanitære kriseren_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.source.pagenumber74 s.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel