Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPugh, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-20T10:47:55Z
dc.date.available2011-10-20T10:47:55Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.issn0333-3981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/99333
dc.descriptionIn 1996 UK Army doctrine writers revised the consept of wider peacekeeping and produced a draft of Army Field Manual, Peace Support Operations. The doctrinal revision, which has also been influential in NATO, attempts to deal with the inadequacies of peacekeeping in situations of volatile consent by establishing a military spectrum approach. the dangers of vertical mission creep, i.e., peacekeepers being drawn into an escalation and coercion in a planned and controlled way. This approach is a rational choice from a military perspective because it offers greater protection to military deployments. However, it represents move towards a combat-oriented concept that raises legal, political and cultural issues, and could result in insularity from civilian and conflict resolution approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInstitutt for Forsvarsstudieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesForsvarsstudier;2
dc.subjectUSAen_US
dc.subjectforsvarspolitikken_US
dc.subjectdoktrineren_US
dc.subjectfredsbevaringen_US
dc.titleFrom Mission Cringe to Mission Creep?: implications of new peace support operations doctrineen_US
dc.typeOthersen_US
dc.source.pagenumber28 s.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel