Alliances and the arms industry in small states
dc.contributor.author | Schmitt, Olivier | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-31T11:05:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-31T11:05:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1894-4795 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3175640 | |
dc.description.abstract | • In asymmetric alliances, the nature of decisionmaking (coercive or liberal), shapes the possibilities for smaller states to develop their own defense industry. • Liberal asymmetric alliances such as NATO create structural incentives for smaller states to invest in domestic arms industries by emphasizing interoperability, collaboration, and shared standards. Smaller states seeking to develop arms industries must navigate a complex interplay of international and domestic factors, balancing the opportunities provided by alliance membership with the challenges of competing in a globalized defense market. • Smaller states must align domestic policies with alliance objectives to maximize the benefits of membership. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Institutt for forsvarsstudier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | IFS Insights;1 | |
dc.subject | NATO | en_US |
dc.subject | Arms industry | en_US |
dc.subject | Defence industry | en_US |
dc.title | Alliances and the arms industry in small states | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Schmitt, Olivier | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 1-8 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 2025 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | IFS insights | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 1 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IFS Insights [96]